While reading Yahoo news and searching the green section of the news I found this article. Before even reading it, I thought it was in
teresting to see the way that they don't call it global warming but that it is called climate change. This small change really has stuck out to me since listening in class and this article is a perfect example of this.
In Alaska there is many risks of floods because of the heat that has been recently occurring. The problem with this is that it is effecting the way in which the national parks that are in Alaska look. One of the biggest problems is that there has been an increase in wildfires. The animals that live in Alaska are having a difficult time surviving because they depend on the food from the sea and glaciers. Alaska has warmed at least three times as fast than the other states have.Two thirds of the national parks in the U.S. are located in Alaska and we need to save them but this climate is working in a completely different way than normal. The parks are going to experience the temperature going from below freezing to above freezing which will change a lot of the aspects of the national parks. The article really shows the dangers of global warming for our nature.
I find this article to be sad because of the fact that Alaska has so many of our national parks. People who don't believe in global warming or as the article calls it, climate change, they should look at the real life evidence of what is happening in Alaska. With the economic recession and the fact that we are fighting two wars, I think that the whole idea of global warming is being pushed to the side and is not so much in the fore front of conversation like it used to be. I don't like the changing of the name just to make it sound less harsh but I think that it is a good thing that at least someone is bringing it somewhat to the attention of people. Obviously the people of Alaska can see the changes but everyone is oblivious. Many more steps need to be taken in order to fix the problem with global warming.